 |
| |
THE ANGLO-SCOTTISH BORDERS IN THE REIGN OF
MARY, QUEEN OF SCOTS |
|
| |
Originaly prepared by: Rouji Choudhury, Emma Forletta, Clara Graham,
Claire Harden, Carla Holden, Mary
Jefferson, Lucy Johnson, Stephen McCann, Natalie Porch and
Sheila Small. |
|
|
|
Anna Murray and Barry Harden of
Cowdenknowes, Baron of Cowdenknowes |
|
| |
Geography and Physical Character of the
Borders |
|
| |
The Border area between
Scotland and England runs from the Lammermuir Hills through the
Southern Uplands west to Galloway, and on the English side from
Northumberland to Cumberland in the west. These areas encompass
some of the most delightful yet desolate countryside in the
United Kingdom. On the whole the Border country is mountainous
and hilly. Winding rivers, webs of valleys and gullies and
sporadic hills dominate the horizon. |
|
| |
The Tweed Basin is one of the
major physical constituents of the whole area. The River Tweed's
ninety seven mile course flows west to east winding through to
Berwick and also encompasses some of the most important features
of the Border region including the Cheviots, Lammermuirs and
even parts of Liddesdale. |
|
|
 |
The physical development of
the Border area has developed over the course of four or five
million years. Violent earth movements shifted and compressed
upwards, moving strata into a ridge and valley system. The
rolling hills on both sides of the Border offer a glimpse into
how difficult it was to maintain law and order in such an area,
where it was both easy to penetrate and difficult to control in
times of peace and war.
|
the line that is fixed as
the existing Border of today (more or less) was drawn during
the thirteenth century (1222).
Over the centuries the Border became prone not only to
sporadic and often devastating warfare, but also its
inhabitants were subjected to almost continual raiding, even
in peacetime (and amongst themselves). Just as England
bordered on Scotland, confusion bordered chaos. |
|
|
| |
Understanding the Borderers is
no simple task of unravelling neatly interwoven threads. The
Borderline was constantly crossed by the tangled strands of
blood kinship, marriage, vendetta and alliance. |
|
| |
Borderers survived at each
other’s expense. The vast majority lived in poverty and by the
sixteenth century the Borderland was considerably overpopulated.
With both finance and provision in short supply it is far from
surprising that men took to reiving, which is thieving and
plundering each other merely to survive. This was the foundation
that the sixteenth-century Border way of life was built upon and
all aspects of life was affected and altered by it. The houses
were simple because of the likelihood of destruction, and they
contained little furniture. Clothing was simple and food was
extremely basic. |
|
| |
The Border Hierarchy and Administration of
the Borders |
|
| |
Central government, especially
in Scotland was weak and decentralised. Consequently it exerted
little authority over the Borderers. However, society did have a
structure and the family name was everything. The nobility,
particularly in England, were capable of exerting some feudal
authority. The family was the key organisation in society and
they joined together for mutual protection, thus establishing a
‘one for all and all for one’ mentality. Any Borderer who was
discovered without the backing or support of a chief clansman
was sentenced to become a ‘broken man’, an outlaw. If an entire
surname was outlawed they became a ‘broken clan’ and often
passed into the other kingdom for sanctuary, or sought the
‘Debatable Land’ where they could exist as professional thieves. |
|
| |
There were three Wardens of
the Marches on each side of the Border responsible for capturing
criminals, administering justice, and collecting intelligence on
behalf on the government. Political and social matters between
Scotland and England came together in special meetings known as
‘days of truce’. These were supposed to be at regular intervals
to attend to the grievances of the other. The dates were
craftily manipulated to suit, but rough justice was, in one way
or another, eventually reached. Verdicts were passed on the
common complaints of murder, kidnapping, wounding, robbery and
arson. Relations between the English and Scottish Wardens were
often erratic, to say the least, since each was seen as an agent
of the traditional enemy – they were always ready to cause
trouble in each other’s marches; in fact it was often national
policy to do so. |
|
| |
On the Scottish Borders it was
the same families who usually took up office – the Maxwell’s,
the Kerr’s, and the Cessford's. With few exceptions, the
appointed Wardens were local men. The government had little
choice in this matter because no outside man was capable of
exerting sufficient order over the Scots Borderers.
The Sheriffdom was the basic local sententious and
administrative unit of medieval Scotland. The Sheriffs were the
most effective representatives of the Crown. Their efficiency
depended though on effective royal control, which the crown,
weakened by continuous war with England, frequent minorities and
the prevalence of faction rule, could but infrequently provide.
In England, the Council of the North had considerable
jurisdiction in the Borders. There were four sessions held each
year lasting a month at a time. However, its business was only
partly judicial since it also had the job of supervising the
Wardens and ensuring the Acts were properly carried out.
Similarly, In Scotland, the Privy Council sought to enforce
co-operation in the first place by summoning the most important
and powerful Borderers. These men were summoned to discuss
various aspects of the frontier problems, and to give the
council the benefit of their advice.
There were two main methods of keeping order on the Border – the
taking of bands and the submission of pledges. By subscribing to
a ‘general band’ the Borderer undertook to ‘keep good rule’,
each being accountable for the good behaviour of his own tenants
and adherents.The Borderer in question placed his lands and
goods in legal jeopardy; as material security guaranteeing his
promise. If no landowner would accept responsibility for a clan
or group then human pledges were used. The principle was really
much the same as the general band.Responsibility to bring a
clansman accused of a crime was given to the pledger, and should
this fail to happen then the pledger would himself be punished
according to the nature of the crime. |
|
| |
The Tower House (or Peel Tower) |
|
| |
 |
Tower houses were a vital
aspect of the Border warfare, since they were fortified homes
and bases used to fend off invaders from attack. These buildings
were scattered across the Anglo-Scottish Border.
For obvious reasons, tower houses had to be impregnable
structures. This is why they were mainly tall, imposing
buildings with thick walls. Defensive features that were common
included gun loops, a moat, machicolations, portcullis slots and
chambers, shovel-ended arrow slits and guardrooms. Their
function was to withstand attack, while also being able to
counter-attack.
It is important to remember that although tower houses were
fortified structures and represented the physical base of the
power of the important Borderers, they were still homes in which
people lived. They also functioned as the administrative centre
for the area.
|
|
| |
The year 1542 saw the
reopening of hostilities between England and Scotland. The
English army, under Norfolk, entered Scotland in October. They
caused a large amount of damage; Roxburgh, Kelso and its abbey
were just a few of the casualties. However, a lack of supplies
caused the English to retreat. The force devastated a large area
of the Borders, yet it was hardly victorious.
It was now the turn of the Scots to revenge the devastation
wrought on their Borders. Yet the attempt ended in disaster for
the Scots at Solway Moss. The lack of unity among the Scots had
made Wharton’s job all the more easy and over a thousand
prisoners were taken.
James added to the already precarious state of the nation by
dying 19 days after the battle. He left his daughter Mary, the
week-old infant as his heir. Henry, inspired by the victory
decided to seek the marriage of his son Edward to the infant
Queen of Scots. However, after long negotiations and some
progress with the Treaty of Greenwich in July 1543, it became
clear that he was unlikely to achieve his aim through
negotiation. The Scottish Parliament annulled the Treaty in
December.
Throughout the summer of 1544 some 192 towns were destroyed and
hundreds were killed. The campaign was carried into 1545, but
the Scots were not totally despondent as Angus proved in
February with the Scottish victory at Ancrum Moor. Towards the
end of Henry’s reign warfare between England and Scotland tailed
off. |
|
| |
With Somerset as Lord
Protector, the period 1547-1550 saw a renewed and intensified
effort by the English to achieve control of Scotland. But, the
goal of union through the marriage of Mary and Edward was
tackled with quite a different approach. Previous invasions had
been of limited success as they retreated so soon after their
destruction had been wrought. Instead, his programme consisted
of the establishment and subsequent maintenance of military
bases that would create a ‘pale’ of English control within
Scotland and bring to heel inhabitants within their reach.
The commencement of Somerset’s long-term plans was a crushing
defeat of the Scots at the Battle of Pinkie. Preparations had
been operative for months beforehand and included the
strengthening of existing Border forts namely Berwick, Holy
Island, and Wark. Following the victory, Somerset and his army
established a series of garrisons in southern and eastern parts
of the country. English forces were stationed at Hume Castle,
Roxburgh Castle and Eyemouth on the Scottish Borders. In the
same weeks, Wharton, aided by Lennox, was battering areas of the
West March.
Garrisons had a multi-purpose nature. They were intended to
dominate |
|
| |
the traffic and hinterlands of
Scotland’s great coastal rivers; act as bases from which new
holds could offer aid and protection to troops; extend the line
of border; attack the property of Scots who refused to support
the English, protecting those who did assure and employing them
to harry their fellow countrymen.
If Somerset’s initial success had held he might have won,
however, French intervention on the side of the Scots soon swung
back the balance and introduced a new element of conflict upon
the Borders. Henri II was anxious to restore and extend French
influence in Scotland. Fearing considerable French intervention,
the English effected a frantic yet relatively well-organised
escalation of their position in the winter of 1547-48. The style
of fortification employed by Somerset dramatically transformed
the situation that the French forces encountered upon their
arrival. This was the ‘trace italienne’ method. However, within
little more than a year the French had firmly entrenched
themselves in Scotland. Somerset’s grip on the Scottish Borders
was gradually loosened. The English garrisoning of Scotland
became unworkable. Some of the strongholds were abandoned due to
economical, manning and victualling problems. Others fell to the
enemy at the end of 1548 and during 1549. Using Jedburgh as his
subsequent base, D’Esse made some successful expeditions across
the English Borders. |
 |
|
| |
Scots Dyke and the French on the Borders |
|
| |
Along the Border, Northwest of
the River Esk and east as far as the River Sark, lay a strip of
land no more than 12 miles long and 4 miles wide, which was
referred to as the ‘Debatable Land’. The area was a cause of
great concern to the governments of both realms, for it was a
lawless district in which no crown jurisdiction operated. The
trouble was that the ownership of the territory was a matter of
dispute between the two crowns and consequently neither side
could be held responsible for the activities of the people
there. Prior to 1552, the government’s solution had been to
devastate the land. It was an ineffective solution however, for
it had no long-term effect.
By 1552 it was established that ‘the redyst and most convenyent
way to further and advaunce the contynaunce of the amytie and
peace betwixt the realmes…is…the devysion equally of the said
Debatable Landes’. The overseer of the whole affair was the
French ambassador to Scotland, Monsieur D’Oysel. Effectively a
line was drawn from the River Sark to the River Esk. The western
segment was given to England, while the east belonged to the
Scots. Not only did this verdict finally solve the issue of land
ownership, but the division also served to separate the two
great families of the Debatable Land; the Armstrong’s and the
Grahams. Although the area still harboured the worst elements of
the frontier, the division made it possible for the Wardens to
maintain at least a semblance of order, a distinct improvement.
The line drawn on the map soon became a ditch, which is now
referred to as Scots Dyke: the first man-made border in Europe. |
|
| |
 |
For the English it was Berwick
that was the focus of their re-fortification works in the
1550’s, whilst the French built a large fort near Langholme
posing a threat to England.
The conflict that broke out towards the end of the decade
stemmed from the war that had resumed between France and Spain
in 1556. The English, tied to Spain through the marriage of Mary
Tudor to Philip of Spain, were pressured to show support and
formally declared war on France in June 1557. The Scots followed
suit by launching half-hearted attacks into England in
September.
The restoration of the fort at Eyemouth by the French was the
major accomplishment of the war of 1557. The French saw Eyemouth
as the ideal location for fortification – for storing artillery
close to the Border, and as an immediate threat on the English
stronghold at Berwick.
|
|
| |
Border History 1569-1573: Barrier to Gateway
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
In 1569 the Borders were still
the central point of Anglo-Scottish disagreement, accentuated by
the problems in Scotland between those nobles that represented
the young King, and those who were still trying to restore Mary
to the throne. In April 1570 the English launched a
three-pronged attack on the Scottish Borders. The English forces
ravaged and burnt the Scottish countryside, destroying 50
castles.
Yet in 1571, events in Scotland changed dramatically, affecting
the position of the Borders forever. Civil war broke out in
Scotland, with the Queen’s party lead by William Kirkcaldy of
Grange entrenched in Edinburgh castle. Elizabeth wanted to be
seen as a mediator between the two warring parties and the
leading men on the Borders became crucial agents for Elizabeth
in Scotland and as mediators in the civil war. After the
conclusion of the war and the supremacy of the young king James
established in Scotland a new alliance between the Scots and the
English became possible. It resulted in the essential change of
the Borders, from a disordered, troublesome ‘no-mans land’, to a
gateway between the new English-Scottish alliance. And although
they were not by any means peaceful, the crucial divide between
the two countries had changed forever. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Central Authorities and the Administration of
the Borders 1542-1568 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
To a certain extent the years
1543-1568 were characterised by the Crown’s struggle to obtain a
close control of the Borders. Consequently, numerous attempts
(not all successful) to change and improve the existing
machinery of Border administration were made by Arran, Mary of
Guise, and Mary Stuart. Such reforms generally involved personal
input from the regent or monarch and a commitment to visiting
the region, in the form of military and judicial expeditions to
ensure the effective administration of justice. Such expeditions
generally consisted of the holding of a ‘justice ayre’ and a
‘muster’. The justice ayre was a kind of royal law court in the
localities to deal with felons that the local authorities were
unable or not allowed to deal with. It was often accompanied by
a royal force to ensure that punishments were carried out, and
justice prevailed. Musters were usually proclaimed in the
localities in advance and were designed to search out particular
criminals or outlaws. Council meetings were also often attended
on these visits.
As Governor, Arran’s first significant expedition to the Borders
took place in February 1545, when, at the head of a military
force, he attacked the English near Jedburgh and Kelso. Later,
in July 1547 Arran drove deep into the south-west and recaptured
Langholme from the English. But after this Arran spent little
time on the Borders. The last important Border expedition of his
political career occurred between October and November 1552. He
led his final muster, which met at Jedburgh, and subsequently
attended council meetings there. The administrative situation in
the Borders was in a somewhat stronger state at Arran’s fall
from power than it had been preceding his rise. This was due
mainly to the decline of the international threat from England. |
|
| |
 |
Mary of Guise’s period of
regency was dominated by Franco-centric policies that inspired
her to attempt various reforms of Border administration. She
particularly advocated the increased use of general bands and
pledges. Mary also instigated and controlled much of the
negotiation between English, Scottish and French over the
division of the Debatable land. Rather than enforcing
punishments on lesser criminals, Mary attempted to use
remissions to compel them to reveal the whereabouts of other
known criminals. In spite of promising initiatives for the
improvement of administration in the localities, most reforms
implemented under Mary were ineffective or unable to be
consistently sustained. Moreover, due to the French domination
of Scottish politics there developed a steadily increasing
dislike of Frenchmen and central authorities. This particularly
worked against Mary as she had tried to infiltrate the Border
administration system with central officials (some of whom were
French) to keep a tighter control over affairs there. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Overall, Mary of Guise
probably spent less time on the Borders the either her daughter
or Arran. The Borders at the end of her period of rule had
pretty much reverted back to the turbulent situation they had
been in at the advent of her rise to power. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
From the time she returned to
Scotland on 19th August 1561, Mary, Queen of Scots involved
herself in all aspects of government, forming and following
moderate policies that generally took into account the needs and
desires of her people. This is somewhat reflected in her
policies towards the Borders. When possible she liked to travel
around her country and she managed to do so in most of the years
of her reign. This helped her strengthen ties and loyalties with
the Scottish people, especially in places like the Borders,
which were usually isolated from the central authorities and,
just as importantly, afforded her an insight into their ways of
life. As far as can be ascertained these personal visits,
conducted to the Borders in 1562-3, 1564-5 and 1566-8, instilled
in the inhabitants something resembling an allegiance to their
monarch. Furthermore, personal visits enabled Mary to work out
for herself the particular problems in the Borders. |
|
| |
However, in a military or
judicial role she did not spend a great deal of time in the
region. Her first important visit in this capacity was proposed
for January 1564, when she intended to hold council at Jedburgh.
But due to bad weather and the Queen’s illness this journey was
postponed. It eventually took place in October 1565 when the
Queen led an expedition to Dumfries. In October of the following
year Mary held Justice Ayres at Jedburgh and Kelso and also held
a muster at Melrose. Between October and November Mary also
attendant with the Council on the Borders. It was during this
visit that she embarked on a perilous journey to Bothwell’s
castle at Hermitage on 16th October, giving rise to speculations
over the nature of their relationship. |
|
|
|